Document the identity field validation contract #71
Etiketter
Inga etiketter
area/backups
area/ci
area/control-panel
area/identity
area/infra
area/observability
area/payments
area/security
area/storage
area/web
blocked
needs-info
needs-triage
ready-for-implementation
type
bug
type
chore
type
docs
type
epic
type
feature
type
task
wontfix
Ingen milstolpe
Inget projekt
Inga tilldelade
1 deltagare
Notiser
Förfallodatum
Inget förfallodatum satt.
Beroenden
Inga beroenden satta
Referens
bitborg/bitborg-docs#71
Läser in…
Hänvisa till i nytt ärende
Ingen beskrivning angiven.
Ta bort grenen "%!s()"
Borttagning av en gren är permanent. Även om den borttagna grenen kan fortsätta existera en kort tid innan den faktiskt tas bort, kan det INTE ångras i de flesta fall. Vill du fortsätta?
The identity ownership decision record settles who owns each field but not what a valid value
is. Three systems each enforce their own rules, and today the union exists only as a regex in the
sign-up endpoint whose comment misdescribes it.
Add a cross-cutting design note stating the intersection rule for username, email and display name;
which system contributes each constraint and why; the pinned versions the rules were read from; and
the upgrade obligation — when either dependency is bumped, re-read the rules and update the tests.
Link it from the identity ownership decision record and from the version-pin decision record's
upgrade checklist.
Part of #66.