docs(issue-tracking): add the blocked triage state and the epic-closing rule #59
Inga granskare
Etiketter
Inga etiketter
area/backups
area/ci
area/control-panel
area/identity
area/infra
area/observability
area/payments
area/security
area/storage
area/web
blocked
needs-info
needs-triage
ready-for-implementation
type
bug
type
chore
type
docs
type
epic
type
feature
type
task
wontfix
Ingen milstolpe
Inget projekt
Inga tilldelade
1 deltagare
Notiser
Förfallodatum
Inget förfallodatum satt.
Beroenden
Inga beroenden satta
Referens
bitborg/bitborg-docs!59
Läser in…
Hänvisa till i nytt ärende
Ingen beskrivning angiven.
Ta bort grenen "docs/issue-tracking-blocked-label"
Borttagning av en gren är permanent. Även om den borttagna grenen kan fortsätta existera en kort tid innan den faktiskt tas bort, kan det INTE ångras i de flesta fall. Vill du fortsätta?
Three conventions that were missing, each found by a board drifting away from the truth rather than
by reading the guide.
blockedbitborg-infra#39 (migrate off-site backups to Bahnhof S3) has been fully evaluated for weeks. It
cannot be picked up because Bahnhof has not released the product. The only label that fit was
needs-triage, whose stated meaning is "not yet evaluated" — the opposite of the truth, and enoughto make the issue look neglected in every triage sweep.
Adds a
blockedtriage state (created org-wide, applied to #39) and a lifecycle step saying torecord what it waits on and to drop the label when the dependency clears.
When an epic closes
Roadmap epics bitborg-docs#51 (sign-up trial) and #54 (ADR 0037 reconcile trigger) both sat in the
Shipped column while still open. In each case the build scope was fully delivered and what
remained was not building: an operator-gated end-of-August downgrade in one, a phase explicitly
deferred to the payments programme in the other.
There was no written rule, so both stayed open — which meant the Shipped column described delivered,
production-verified work as pending. That is the more misleading of the two available errors. The
rule now: build scope delivered closes the epic; a dated operational remainder becomes its own task
in the repository that will carry it out, linked from the closing comment.
Boardless task issues
bitborg-docs#14 (write ADR 0026) has been open since 10 July and appeared on no board, because
bitborg-docs had no project board — the guide only named bitborg-infra and bitborg-web as
task-bearing repositories. A Bitborg Docs board now exists and #14 sits on it.
States plainly that every repository holding task issues has a board, and that a task in a boardless
repository is invisible work.
markdownlintand Prettier clean.